I've been re-watching a bit of the West Wing. I finally caught up with the end of Season 7 which I'd never seen and now regret I ever wasted time watching. They clearly had absolutely no idea what to do once John Spencer died as they couldn't really go into governing. They should have just given it a couple episodes to wrap up but I guess tell that to the channel controllers.
But I was reading how there were quite animated debates in the writing room about whether Vinick or Santos should win. Santos was always likely to win but it seems those who were writing Vinick really believed he should win.
Which I think is a great idea for a show. You set up a race- a mayoral race. There are going to be a number of inaugural mayor races in Britain over the next couple years so you can set them there. You go for one like Birmingham where it's conceivable someone other than Labour can win. And you assign writers to the teams and get them to write and direct their bits. You have controllers who are going to chuck problems and information at them and will stop the writers making their characters too likeable and perfect but it's up to the writing, directing and acting team to respond to the events, whether personal or political.
And you could have it semi-live, maybe a couple weeks behind so that the opinion of those watching it can dictate opinion polls. I think it could be a great mix of drama and interactivity. It would also be a great way for a city to be explored. The issues that matter locally will come to the fore and it could give people and idea of politics beyond Westminster.
BBC are moving to Salford so maybe it could be their way of discovering their new city.
Showing posts with label politics. Show all posts
Showing posts with label politics. Show all posts
Sunday, 20 March 2011
The Adjustment Bureau
The Adjustment Bureau
Something I would not recommend to say as you're going into the cinema with someone is 'Nick I don't think I'm going to like this'. Can make you a little nervous.
Naturally expectations being the game it is, I came out frustrated and she came out pleasantly surprised.
But then she thought she was being taken to see a Bourne rip off and I thought I was going to see a modern Matter of Life and Death.
So first, the Bourne bits. Matt Damon is very good at running. If you've seen a Bourne film you'd know that. But it bears repeating. Most people would look ridiculous but he manages to pull it off. Which is just as well as he does a lot of it.
My worry is that he is the reason why there is so much running. It's a film which is trying to mix a number of things: fantasy, romance, action film and political thriller. And it could probably have succeeded if it had just tried three. I'm just bit sure which three.
Fantasy has to be kept. It's the best bit. There's a wonderful world created of trilbies, transporting through doors and highly bureaucratic angels. It's well conceived, fun and nicely executed. With the exception of the man Damon who can't pull off a trilby at all, everyone looks very snazzy and it gives a great feel to it.
Romance doesn't quite work. I don't really like Emily blunt in it. Partly I don't like her in it, she doesn't quite have the charm. Partly their scenes togetheraren't that well written.
They're not terrible. But not sparkling.
But mostly the problem is that she is a cipher. She doesn't have her own plot. She just is chased first by mr Damon in a nice way and then by the trilbies in a nasty way. Afterwards we were talking about how much more interesting it would be if she was the one who could be a great president and he had to decide whether to risk sacrificing that. Or if her fiancée was actually the person that really mattered and they needed her to support him. And finally they just simply didn't spend enough time together for it to feel right. They needed to have at least spent one night together before he gets too obsessed.
Action: as I said he's very good at running and it gives the film a pace that makes it refreshing given the rest of the subject matter. The director is no Paul greengrass though so while it's fine, it's nothing to write home about.
Political thriller. The first sequence, with him campaigning through to him giving a speech about how everything is focus grouped is really nicely put together. You get the feeling this is one of the bits which the director felt most assured with. And given the amount of
The Democratic party establishment who turn up in the first 10 pages, it's probably the bit he knows best. But they seem to drop it. He's told that they've manipulated his life to make him driven to be President. And that's set up as a bad thing, a cruel piece of social engineering which denies him his chance of happiness. Which is obviously true but I don't think it's considered much of a dilemma. The sense of duty, that the world might need him to be president, is shrugged aside very quickly in a way that I think makes the final decision somewhat unsatisfying.
So I'm not sure what bit i'd drop. I'd just like nearly all of them to be better. It's a great idea and so many details are great and imaginative. But it doesn't quite take the subject matter by the scruff of the neck. It, like so many of my own ideas, doesn't fulfil the promise of the premise. But at least his made a film.
Something I would not recommend to say as you're going into the cinema with someone is 'Nick I don't think I'm going to like this'. Can make you a little nervous.
Naturally expectations being the game it is, I came out frustrated and she came out pleasantly surprised.
But then she thought she was being taken to see a Bourne rip off and I thought I was going to see a modern Matter of Life and Death.
So first, the Bourne bits. Matt Damon is very good at running. If you've seen a Bourne film you'd know that. But it bears repeating. Most people would look ridiculous but he manages to pull it off. Which is just as well as he does a lot of it.
My worry is that he is the reason why there is so much running. It's a film which is trying to mix a number of things: fantasy, romance, action film and political thriller. And it could probably have succeeded if it had just tried three. I'm just bit sure which three.
Fantasy has to be kept. It's the best bit. There's a wonderful world created of trilbies, transporting through doors and highly bureaucratic angels. It's well conceived, fun and nicely executed. With the exception of the man Damon who can't pull off a trilby at all, everyone looks very snazzy and it gives a great feel to it.
Romance doesn't quite work. I don't really like Emily blunt in it. Partly I don't like her in it, she doesn't quite have the charm. Partly their scenes togetheraren't that well written.
They're not terrible. But not sparkling.
But mostly the problem is that she is a cipher. She doesn't have her own plot. She just is chased first by mr Damon in a nice way and then by the trilbies in a nasty way. Afterwards we were talking about how much more interesting it would be if she was the one who could be a great president and he had to decide whether to risk sacrificing that. Or if her fiancée was actually the person that really mattered and they needed her to support him. And finally they just simply didn't spend enough time together for it to feel right. They needed to have at least spent one night together before he gets too obsessed.
Action: as I said he's very good at running and it gives the film a pace that makes it refreshing given the rest of the subject matter. The director is no Paul greengrass though so while it's fine, it's nothing to write home about.
Political thriller. The first sequence, with him campaigning through to him giving a speech about how everything is focus grouped is really nicely put together. You get the feeling this is one of the bits which the director felt most assured with. And given the amount of
The Democratic party establishment who turn up in the first 10 pages, it's probably the bit he knows best. But they seem to drop it. He's told that they've manipulated his life to make him driven to be President. And that's set up as a bad thing, a cruel piece of social engineering which denies him his chance of happiness. Which is obviously true but I don't think it's considered much of a dilemma. The sense of duty, that the world might need him to be president, is shrugged aside very quickly in a way that I think makes the final decision somewhat unsatisfying.
So I'm not sure what bit i'd drop. I'd just like nearly all of them to be better. It's a great idea and so many details are great and imaginative. But it doesn't quite take the subject matter by the scruff of the neck. It, like so many of my own ideas, doesn't fulfil the promise of the premise. But at least his made a film.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)